Episode 409: Spoilers

“Jeremiah is dead! Barnabas is here! The book is wrong!”

Every time travel story has to figure out the answer to the big question, the one that Ebenezer Scrooge asks the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come in A Christmas Carol. Confronted with a vision of a future where his own death inspires only joy and relief that he’s gone, Scrooge asks, “Are these the shadows of the things that Will be, or are they shadows of things that May be, only?”

In Scrooge’s case, the answer turns out to be things that May be. He still has the opportunity to wake up on Christmas morning, buy the Cratchits a turkey, and change his fate.

Ray Bradbury’s seminal time travel story, “A Sound of Thunder”, adds a scary element of chaos-theory mischance — stepping on a butterfly in the prehistoric past produces subtle but devastating ripples in the present. Taking up the alternate position, Robert A. Heinlein’s story “By His Bootstraps” describes a circular timeline, where the time-traveler has to follow a path that he’s already seen his future self walk.

Every writer who tells a time travel story ends up taking a position somewhere on that continuum between “the things that Will be” and “the things that May be.”

Except for Dark Shadows, of course, which is being written at the last minute, during a hurricane, by lunatics who didn’t even realize they were writing a time travel story until it just kind of suddenly already happened.

408 dark shadows search josette natalie

But over the next few episodes, Dark Shadows becomes a time travel story, for keeps. The events of the next few days will become the beating heart of the story for the rest of the show’s run — even when Vicki gets back to 1968, we’ll see wave after wave of refugees from the 18th century, which only ends when the show chooses a new historical period to visit.

But for a show that’s so dominated by traveling back and forth from the past to the future, Dark Shadows is cheerfully cavalier about how it’s all supposed to work. The writers have no idea whether there’s predestination or free will, and they clearly couldn’t care less.

And right here is pretty much the point where that happens — the day that kindly old Grandfather Paradox settles into his not-very-easy chair, and tells us a story that could never have been about to have happened.

408 dark shadows find josette

Because now Josette’s got The Book.

Our irresponsible lead character, time-traveling governess Victoria Winters, has decided to save Josette from the cliff-diving suicide that we’ve always known is in store for her. Vicki’s currently being held in the Collinsport Gaol on suspicion of witchcraft, and in a misguided attempt to wreck the structure of causation for everybody else, she’s told Josette where to find the Collins Family History that she brought with her into the past from 1967.

She thinks that if Josette is warned about her fate, she’ll be able to avoid it. The possibility that knowing her predestined fate is the thing that actually drives her off the edge of the cliff does not appear to have occurred to anyone.

408 dark shadows copyright natalie josette

So here we are at the inaugural meeting of the book club. Opening the book, Josette spots the copyright date — it was printed in Bangor, in 1965.

That means that this object that they’re holding is only two years old, so why it looks all weather-beaten and ancient is a bit of a mystery. I guess they’re hard on books in the mid-60s.

408 dark shadows spoilers natalie josette

Josette, like everybody on television, is blessed with the magical gift of opening to the exact page that she’s looking for, on the very first try. It looks like the Josette bio is about seven-eighths of the way through the volume, so I guess the Collins family kind of front-loaded all the interesting stories before 1795, and then pretty much coasted from there.

408 dark shadows book portrait

So here’s Josette and Natalie, making contact with the unknown. They’re actually pretty chill about it, all things considered.

Josette:  Natalie, look! It’s my portrait! It only arrived last week from Paris; how could it…

Natalie:  I don’t know.

And that’s all she has to say on the subject. You see? So chill.

409 dark shadows guide natalie josette

Josette (reading):  Josette du Prés Collins, wife of Jeremiah Collins, was born in Martinique, came to Collinsport in 1795, and —

409 dark shadows never josette

She stops reading, and shudders.

Natalie:  What is it?

Josette:  I would never do that! Never!

Natalie:  Never do what?

409 dark shadows hand natalie josette

She keeps reading.

Josette:  Died by her own hand that same winter… 1795.

409 dark shadows life natalie josette

What follows is a metatextual argument about the status of the Jeremiah retcon.

Three months ago, just a few weeks before the 1795 storyline started, Barnabas brought Julia out to Widow’s Hill and told her the story of Josette’s marriage to his uncle Jeremiah, and his own secret attraction to her. Then Vicki took a time tunnel back a couple centuries, and what we saw was completely different — Josette came to Collinwood to marry Barnabas, not Jeremiah.

409 dark shadows not true natalie josette

They changed their minds; it’s as simple as that. When Barnabas told Julia about his tragic past, the writers had no idea they were going to be visiting that past in just a few weeks. They didn’t have a plan for how they were going to unfold this story. The Dark Shadows writers never have a plan. They just decided that it would be more story-productive to do something else.

Now, the sensible thing to do is just to keep on going, and pretend that that never happened. It’s 1968; nobody has a VCR or a season pass. It would be easy for the writers to decide that nobody was going to remember what Barnabas said three months ago anyway.

But this is Dark Shadows, where they rarely take the sensible path. They spot that incongruity, and they head straight for it.

Natalie (reading):  Jeremiah Collins met Josette du Prés when he was on a business trip to Martinique.

Josette:  That’s not true! He never came to Martinique; I met him here!

Natalie:  You see?

Josette:  Go on.

Natalie (reading): Josette was the daughter of Andre du Prés, who owned the largest sugar plantation in the West Indies. When Miss du Prés arrived in Collinsport for her marriage to Jeremiah —

409 dark shadows true natalie josette

Josette interrupts again.

Josette:  No! When I arrived in Collinsport, I was going to marry Barnabas!

Natalie:  You see? None of it is true.

Josette:  But it almost is. I did marry Jeremiah. It’s almost as if somebody knew some of the facts, and wrote them down, and did not know what actually did happen.

409 dark shadows pale josette

Natalie (reading):  But in Collinsport, the marriage between Josette and Jeremiah seemed unhappy… and family legend has it that Jeremiah’s nephew, Barnabas, was attracted to his uncle’s wife.

Josette:  That’s true!

Natalie (reading):  The legend further has it that Barnabas, realizing the futility of his love, removed himself to England.

Josette:  England?

Natalie (reading):  … Where he enjoyed a long and prosperous life.

409 dark shadows retcon natalie josette

That’s a very clever connection, which ties this retcon all the way back to Barnabas’ first appearance, when he introduced himself to the present-day Collins family as a long-lost cousin from England. Now it’s up to Natalie and Josette to decide which version they want to believe — the real facts of their lives, or this strange episode guide from the future that forgot to include a spoiler warning.

409 dark shadows death barnabas joshua

Remarkably, that question is so compelling — why is the story that we’ve seen so different from what we were told before? — that it actually overshadows the other plot point in this episode, which is that Barnabas Collins dies.

That’s a pretty big milestone in the storyline, obviously, but within the structure of this episode, that event is framed as just a piece of evidence that helps Natalie and Josette figure out whether to believe the book.

409 dark shadows trip joshua

You can tell that Barnabas’ death isn’t the focus of the episode, because he drops at the end of act three. The real cliffhanger shock happens a few minutes later, when Joshua tells them about his plan to cover up Barnabas’ death.

Joshua knows that if people find out that Barnabas died of the plague, there’ll be a panic, ruining the Collins business, and probably destroying the entire town. So he’s got another idea.

Joshua:  I have decided to keep my son’s death a secret.

Natalie:  A secret?

Joshua:  It is my wish, and I trust that you will follow it. Tomorrow, I will spread the word that Barnabas left suddenly, on a business trip to England.

409 dark shadows true lies natalie josette

Josette turns to Natalie, in horror and shock.

Josette:  England!

Natalie:  Josette…

Josette:  The book — the book! It’s true!

It’s gorgeous, a moment of pure inspiration that turns a retcon-mistake into a thrilling plot twist. But that’s the great thing about time travel; there’s always an opportunity for another second chance.

Tomorrow: Nightfall.

Dark Shadows bloopers to watch out for:

When Natalie tries to convince Josette not to believe the book, she says, “But, Josette — you were not married to Jeremiah. Jeremiah is dead! Barnabas is here! The book is wrong!” She means to say “you didn’t come to Collinwood to marry Jeremiah.” You can tell that she realizes that she’s made a mistake as it’s coming out of her mouth; she stumbles for a moment, and then moves on to the next line.

A moment later, a mysterious wind blows out the candles on the desk in front of them. But it only blows out one of the three candles. The stagehands try again, but they only blow out one of the two remaining lit candles. Then the director cuts away so you don’t have to see them keep trying to blow the third candle out.

 Tomorrow: Nightfall.

409 dark shadows bat naomi natalie

 Dark Shadows episode guide

— Danny Horn

23 thoughts on “Episode 409: Spoilers

  1. That London idea was a pretty good save on the part of Joshua (and the writers). However the comments about Jeremiah and Josette’s marriage being an unhappy one and mentioning Josette’s ‘attraction to Barnabas’ in the family history sound pretty sketchy and not something that Joshua would want officially recorded for posterity. Also the 1965 printing date is a pretty sloppy move on the part of the writers. I guess this version of the book must have been a reprint of the original. At least they’re making some effort to reconcile the gaping plot inconsistencies that they became stuck with as a result of Barnabas’ sudden popularity on the show.

    1. True, its probably gossip from another source. Joshua has a real switch in his brain when Barnabas is dying you can tell he really cares and when he tells the others about his decision to keep Barnabas death a secret to prevent a panic over the plague at the shipyards he goes cold again.

  2. The powerful write the history books.

    That’s an incredibly subversive message for a daytime soap in the 1960s.

  3. Just wait until Barnabas is the one doing time traveling. He may or not have been warned about not tampering with the timeline. Never mind. Just be tankfull that what he does in the past does not cause a present where mankind is enslaved by a giant giraffe.

  4. So either it’s like they say and this is just a poorly researched history book, or some earlier action sent Barnabas to meet Josette on the trip instead when she originally met and married Jeremiah.

  5. I can’t wait for your review of the scene where Barnabas tells Magda in 1897 that the CFH will be in 1897 from Vicki’s 1967 trip to 1795 because 1968 hasn’t happened yet (so Eve couldn’t go back to 1796 and steal it to show Jeff/Peter). LOL

  6. Though this isn’t my favorite episode so far it might be the most representative. The show has become complex not because it’s a well wrought urn–it’s not even close. But the show has so committed to being a narrative perpetual motion that it accrues details and meanings by sheer volume. When Josette attempts to comfort a dying Barnabas with a lie that future vampire Barnabas will act out is poignant. And she was given this recon by the time traveling babysitter that Barnabas attempts to turn into Josette; well, that’s something too.

    And then the bat. This is the heart I find beating inside “Dark Shadows” that I love so much. It is a marvel of narrative bravery and vision that is constantly interrupted by a rubber bat on a string. And each element is unsatisfying on its own. “Dark Shadows” would have actually been reckoned a worse show had the production values not distracted the eye. But those production values also draw attention to a show that tells a deviously complex story. You need the balance of the genuine and the campy and almost nothing else has ever done that.

    1. That bat. In this episode especially, which was otherwise a rather dramatic and as you point out poignant episode, it is almost as if the writers at the last minute said, “this episode is all too normal to be dark shadows. We need a bat!”.

      1. I took the bat’s presence as signifying Barnanas’ deparure from the living and his entry into the world of the undead–very spooky.

  7. Loved this episode — anything with Naomi and Joshua is good. It isn’t perfect, but 1795 delivers. If I could just purge my nagging thoughts of Angelique’s wildly varying powers out of my head …

  8. What a difference a day makes. Yesterday I thought these writers were clueless with no imagination. Today I realize they were one step ahead all the time. Can you say Keyser Soze.

  9. I wonder if Sam Hall came in to work, saw the mess Sproat had made in recent episodes, and decided only he could clean it up.

  10. So…let me get this straight. Barnabas and Jeremiah are dead, Josette is about to take her header off the cliffs, Sarah won’t make it to her teens, Millicent never marries and Naomi and Abigail are way past child-bearing years. So how do they work it so Elizabeth and Roger are descended from these people? There’s no one left! Except Angelique…

    On another note, nice depiction of the extremely rare (and possibly mythic) New England Vampire Hummingbird Bat hovering at the end of Act III.

    1. I’ve been thinking the same thing, who are the 1968 Collins family descended from if the people from 1795 had no issue?

    2. That crossed my mind, too. The only only solution I see is that the present-day family is descended from Cousin Daniel, who accompanied Millicent although he’s as yet unseen. Since both Millicent and Daniel are described as “distant” cousins (distant enough that Jeremiah and Millicent were considered as possible marriage partners) then that means the blood connection between the 1967 Collins relatives and Barnabas is actually quite tenuous.

  11. I’ve been thinking the same thing, who are the 1968 Collins family descended from if the people from 1795 had no issue?

  12. This is really a fantastic episode with our show’s five leading actors throughout providing solid performances that are nuanced and emotionally charged (well, there is Barnabas still moaning with the Caretaker’s Syndrome, but, hey, even he snaps out of that at one point).

  13. Wow!! What amazing commentary by all above. Neil Meyer: loved your assessment of the show’s incredible mix of the “genuine and the campy,” which is really spot-on. To think that they had to block the actresses to be frightened of “bat by Bill Baird,” with a special effect that is dubbed onto the video (?) is truly amazing. (How is the bat done in this episode? Because it looks superimposed onto the video negative–I would think that might have been expensive in 1968).

    The book from the present is the same tome that they’ve been referencing for quite some time (certainly since the #210 eps) so to say it’s publishing date is 1965 COULD possibly be accurate in that the book might have been purchased at an antique store and Elizabeth Collins might have used it to assemble the CFH. (Like Joanne, we certainly do our best here to help the writers make sense of their own mess, don’t we?)

    Also, Naomi babbles some nonsense about “Bangor being in Massachusetts, not Maine,” which completely went over my head. Can anyone decipher that for me? I wasn’t sure what the point of that line was or is.

    Danny–absolutely LOVE the literary references you sprinkle your posts with. It is so goddamned refreshing to have another bibliophile out there who understands literature and is able to bring into the discussion the most incisive and inclusive literary takes as they bear on the episode being discussed. Truly, that aspect of things makes this blog simply A MUST READ DAILY part of my life these days. What an absolute joy you are!

    Finally, it is AMAZING that the so-called “death of Barnabas” is given such short shrug that even we, the audience, only give it an afterthought. We are all part of the larger secret the show shares and are secure in the knowledge that our man Barnabas will live to fight (and bite) another day.

    1. Maine didn’t become a state until 1820. Before that it was considered part of Massachusetts, hence the Countess’s confusion about Bangor’s location.

    2. I thought it was also interesting that Angelique was not present at Barnabus’s death. Although this is my second time through 1795 since watching the series all the way through, I can’t remember how Angelique finds out. I’m interested to see how she takes the news.

  14. I found the deathbed reconciliation of Barnabas and Joshua quite touching. It was ironic that Joshua apologized for opposing Barnabas’s marriage to Angelique when in fact he was 100% correct to have done so.

  15. Excellent episode and commentary by everyone. Josette’s fear that the family history book’s account may be true is chillingly illustrated by her on-the-money observation that “It’s almost as if somebody knew some of the facts, and wrote them down, and did not know what actually did happen.”

    The scenes in which Naomi and Joshua try to cope with the impending loss of their son are very poignant. In particular, we finally see Joshua, the cold, stern family patriarch, regretting his past mistakes and openly displaying his sorrow. Especially moving was Joshua’s reassuring his son that he would not have been angry with him if he had known that, as a boy, he did cry when Josuah was brought back home wounded from the Revolutionary War. Kudos to both Frid and Edmonds for their sensitive, nuanced acting in that sequence.

    One question, though: When Barnabas asked Joshua to let him see Josette, but to keep Angelique away from him, why didn’t his father immediately suspect Angelique of wrong doing? To me, that would have been a sure tip-off that she was not what she appeared to be.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s